There are five big names you will hear over and over again in the context of container orchestration: Kubernetes, Mesos (DC/OS), ECS, Swarm, and Nomad. Narrowing Down Container Orchestration Tools
#Docker swarm vs kubernetes vs mesos vs openshift software
It sounds like pure magic, but there is a lot of complicated software running this, and as extremely complicated software tends to be, everything works great until it doesn’t. The entire point of an orchestration infrastructure is to provide a simple way to “schedule” containers and let the underlying infrastructure do the rest. But when you find yourself managing thousands of containers, each with different versions, relationships and network configurations, things begin to get a bit crazy.įor companies using modern development techniques that heavily rely on containers, the challenge of scaling this type of architecture can be too much to handle.Īnd this is where orchestration comes into the picture. When your application begins to grow and the number of containers you’ve deployed goes up to 100, pressure mounts but it’s still bearable.
Using a bunch of instances and running these containers is pretty easy. Imagine you have 10 containers that serve different purposes. Container orchestration (and I’m purposely avoiding using the word Docker) is not for everyone and does not answer every need. In my opinion, the first ground rule is that if you don’t know why you need orchestration you probably don’t. Being the topic of many articles and conferences, it can sometimes seem as though it is the ONLY topic worthy of discussion.Īt Logz.io, we are now at the end of the process of migrating all of our containers into Kubernetes, and I would like to tell you the story of the process we went through when deciding which orchestration platform to use in the hopes of helping those of you who are still unsure of which tool to use or whether you need orchestration to start with. It’s no big secret that container orchestration is all the rage today.